...gallon. The defense alleged that the fair market price was less than 18 cents per gallon. But the court ruled that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the price as claimed by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs had a verdict for the amount claimed. The defendant...

...taken under the circumstances. In an action for breach of contract in not delivering the goods,—Held, that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the cost to pit of the goods purchased by him in substitution.—Hinde v. Liddell, 44 L J. Rep., QB...

...under the circumstances. In an action for breach of contract in not delivering the goods, — Held, that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the cost to the plaintiff of the goods purchased by him in substitution. Hindtr. LiddM, 44 Law J. Rep....

...the damages by completing thy manufacture of these particular rails and selling them to others, but that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the cost of manufacture. In Roehm v. Horst (32), the Court appeared to take it for granted that the...

...the re-sale, gave a verdict for the plaintiff, with 1202. damages. Held, on motion for a new trial, that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market value of the land at the time of the contract, which, also, in this case was the time of...

...acted upon, and that the P3m> purchasers could on the subsequent liquidation of the company only claim that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market price at each period, and could not claim the difference at the date when, to use the words...

...undelivered glass for the best obtainable prices, and upon which said court held on the last appeal that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the price at which the glass was resold, was not in the record when the case was before the Appellate...

...damages, if any, which the defendant had suffered by reason of nondelivery. The plaintiff's contention was that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market price of the logs at the place of delivery at the time of the default, and that of the defendant...

...between the contract price and the sum realized at the sale. At the trial the court charged the jury that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market value of the sugar at the time of the countermand; and, as there had been no change In market...

...more steel, bad it desired it, at the same price as that paid by it for the steel purchased. Held, that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price of the steel and what it would have cost plaintiff to purchase it. [Ed. Note.— For cases in point,...