 | Thomas A. Street - 1999 - عدد الصفحات: 596
...altogether. As was said a few years later in the well-known case of M' Man-its v. Crickctt (1800),° when a servant quits sight of the object for which he is...longer acts in pursuance of the authority given him and his master will not be answerable for such act. This was the vulnerable point, if there was any, in... | |
 | Henry Flanders - 1999 - عدد الصفحات: 476
...that purpose in the possession of the servant, as his special property, and not the master's. "When a servant quits sight of the object for which he is employed," he observes, " and without having in view his master's orders, pursues that which his own malice suggests,... | |
 | Missouri. Courts of Appeals - 1915 - عدد الصفحات: 844
...apt statement in an English case quoted with approval in Garetzen v. Ehienckel, 50 Mo. lc 108: "When a servant quits sight of the object for which he is employed, and, without having vn view his master 's orders, pursues that which his own malice suggests, he no longer acts in pursuance... | |
| |
Salk. 282, as a general position," that no master is chargeable with the acts of his servant but when he acts in the execution of the authority given him." Now when a servant quits sight of the object for which he is employed, and without having in view... 
