...Elliott, he was liable on his covenant for his failure so to do. The court properly instructed the jury that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the fair and reasonable market value of the land on the day it was to have been conveyed under the...

...the contract after the day on which it was to be paid did not preclude the recovery of damages, and that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price of the seed and the price it subsequently sold for; provided the last sale was made bonajide and to...

...its arrival was offered to the defendant ; but he refused to take it. On the trial it was contended that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the price on the 26th of January, when notice was given. But, on argument, the Exchequer held that...

...the trial judge, applied an improper rule in measuring his damages. The trial judge charged the jury that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price of the glass and its market value on the 21st of April, 1902. ( This was the day defendant notified...

...Ripley v. McClure (c). But no one of these is an authority for the defendant. In Leigh v. Paterson (a) there was a contract by the defendants to supply goods...was the difference between the contract price and the market price on 1st October, when the plaintiffs first knew that the defendants would not fulfil...

...transport merchandise, and to deliver the same at the terminus, on or before a specified day, — Heidi that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price, had it arrived at the place of delivery on the day specified, and the price for which it was actually...

...contract whereby the plaintiff was incapacitated from performing his contract with M. $ A. : held, that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market price on the last day for delivery, and that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover damages...

...deposit and the expenses of investigating the title, but also damages for the loss of his bargain ; and that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the value at the time of the breach of contract ; and that the profit which it was shewn the plaintiff...

...deposit and expenses of investigating the title, but also damages for the loss of his bargain. (2). That the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time of the breach of the contract. (3). That, in the absence of evidence to...

...CUBED. — In an action for failure to deliver hay contracted for, where the Court erroneously charged that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the highest market price of the same article at the time the suit was brought, the error was harmless,...